Bangladesh's Former Leader Sheikh Hasina Wajed Sentenced to Capital Punishment
Bangladesh's former prime minister has been handed capital punishment for human rights violations over her harsh response on student-led protests which caused her forced departure.
Hasina was declared culpable of authorizing deadly measures to be used against demonstrators, among whom around 1,400 people died during the disturbances last year.
The trial proceeded without her presence by the International Crimes Court in Bangladesh, since she went into exile in India since she was forced from power in July 2024.
Prosecutors accused her of being behind hundreds of killings during the protests. She has refuted the entire case, describing the process as "biased and politically motivated".
The decision signifies a decisive point for Bangladesh, as the protests brought forth resentment over long-standing suppression. Families of those killed and injured had demanded severe punishments.
Reacting to the verdict in a comprehensive declaration, she expressed the death penalty was the caretaker administration's way of "eliminating her political faction" as a electoral entity and that she was content of her government's record on civil liberties.
"I do not fear to confront those accusing me in a proper tribunal where the evidence can be weighed and reviewed impartially."
The nation's capital, Dhaka, where the tribunal took place, was under enhanced protection prior to the decision on Monday, with numerous opponents of Hasina organizing a demonstration and applauding as the sentence was declared.
The capital witnessed a notable rise in unrest, with multiple explosives detonated and public transport vehicles burned in the time before the verdict.
A minimum of one detonation was recorded in Dhaka on Monday morning, with no victims identified, area law enforcement officer the police spokesperson stated to media outlets.
The student-led uprising in the previous year began with demands to abolish government job quotas but transformed into a more extensive dissent initiative.
International human rights monitors declared in an analysis in February that the around 1,400 fatalities could amount to "crimes against humanity".
The study recorded the shooting at point-blank range of certain demonstrators, the purposeful disabling of others, unjustified apprehensions and mistreatment.
Leaked audio of a call made by the former leader confirmed by investigative sources during the current year indicated she had sanctioned the use of "deadly arms" in July 2024. The recording was presented in court during the trial.
Before the decision, kin of those who died in the demonstrations told media representatives they wanted strict consequences for Hasina.
Ramjan Ali, whose family member was fatally wounded in July 2024, said he wanted "severe penalty" for her and co-accused who have "engaged in retaliatory actions and abused their power".
A different family member, whose partner was fatally injured near Dhaka in August 2024, said she wanted Hasina's sentence to be "carried out before the election".
"Solely at that point the families of those killed [in the protests] will achieve closure in their hearts."
Since Hasina's ousting, an interim government under the guidance of economic expert Muhammad Yunus has assumed power. A general election is scheduled for February 2026.
Nonetheless, the Awami League, Hasina's political party, was outlawed by Bangladesh's interim government in May.
Hasina warned in the previous month that if the party's candidates were banned from standing in the imminent electoral process, countless would abstain the ballot.
The judgment creates a international dilemma for India and Bangladesh. Authorities have sought her return but so far India has shown no willingness to agree.
Hasina's state-appointed lawyer Mohammad Amir Hossain said he was "sad [and wishes] the decision had been otherwise".
"I cannot even contest because my defendants are not present; that's why I am disappointed," he added.
Recently, Hasina's lawyers said they had filed an urgent appeal to the UN raising serious fair trial and judicial process problems at the ICT.
Legal proceedings involved Hasina in conjunction with her previous domestic affairs official and security forces head.
Even though the verdict grants partial finality to families of killed in the protests, it may do little to soothe the country's political divisions.
"The resentment towards Sheikh Hasina and the the former ruling faction has not subsided," a human rights advocate from the capital informed media outlets. "Both she and the organization has apologised or demonstrated contrition for the killings of hundreds of people."
The activist stated "This creates challenges for the faction to gain approval by a majority of people in this state."
The campaigner further stated that the penalty was not resolution for the families of those fatally and non-fatally harmed.
"We work with numerous persons who lost their limbs forever, they are now disabled, as a result of the harsh measures. They are incapable of excusing her."
A journalist, a commentator on the nation's politics, said the "inherent character of the guilty verdict could make it particularly hard" for the political faction to become a regular participant of the country's governance system again.
This might transform if "an expression of regret occurs and a disassociation with Sheikh Hasina and the previous administration," he stated.